“Arrogance is in everything I do. It is in my
gestures, the harshness of my voice, in the glow of my gaze, in my sinewy,
tormented face.”
- Coco Chanel
A few years ago I was constantly enmeshed by a dark blanket of self-doubt. It was
a lax net on my limbs, coolly preventing me from any sort of positive spurt in
any direction. Completely disbarred from any notion of ambition, I practised the
same activity every day. This activity was living… living in its slowest,
purest form. I did things without reason – eating, drinking, reading and
watching. It was like walking a well-worn path which never seemed to end. It
was one path, separated by two dichotomous ends.
The
linear ignorance I led my life with was pressed tightly between the security of
familiarity and an ever pervading gulf of uncertainty. I never bothered to
cross fully into either territory. I stayed bound to what I knew, to what made
me feel at ease and to what was predictable. What I didn’t realise then, was
that I was only half right about the gulf of uncertainty. It was of course,
uncertain, but retrospectively I see there was nothing so epic about its proportions
that could render it a gulf. Never was I autonomous, and never did I believe I
could achieve anything initially considered insurmountable. The environment
around me had warmed me into a soft ball of plasticine. Easily affected and easily
corrupted.
When
I eventually found the determination to gain resoluteness about myself, my
objectives, my aspirations… I met a new trait I had never come across before. This
was, of course, arrogance. Just reading the word feels so negative, does it not?
Who comes into your mind when you read the word arrogant? Do you dislike this
person? Do not confuse arrogance with vanity, with conceit, or with pride, for
arrogance is not any of those, yet they are inexorably linked. The fantastic aspect
of arrogance (one which I particularly admire) is that it is more to do with revealing one’s vanity, conceit or
pride. When you realise you have control over your image, you are now your
environment. You are now the warmth that shapes you. Arrogance has been a tool
I have used for a long time, whether I used it to cut through that gulf of
uncertainty, or to sculpt an image of myself – the uses I found for it were not
limited.
Humility
is so morally celebrated it is illogical to think that anyone could respect arrogance,
let alone support it. To me arrogance has never been negative or disillusioned.
Every trait about someone tells you something about their character. Do not
take arrogance to be one trait in itself. It is more like a subcategory for the
other traits someone has. If we think of water flowing through a pipe as all
the specific traits connected to arrogance, then the valve that controls this
flow is arrogance, or even, modesty. For some people the valve is open
completely, for some it is shut, and for some it stays at a point constant
between the two. The trick is to keep your hand on that valve at all times,
ready to twist, alter and control.
Those
that are supremely modest must be aware of its leeching existence. Modesty is suitable
in certain circumstances (meeting new people, making good impressions,
etcetera), but the more you try and be modest the higher the risks are of you
eventually sinking into an abyss of self-doubt. Psychology has shown us if we
are conditioned to one thing enough times we begin to truly believe it, and
when you tell yourself you are ‘just alright’ or that you ‘aren’t that special’,
you are continually detracting from the true self-worth you possess. Of course,
one can argue if you use arrogance all the time, you can trick yourself into
believing you are better than you actually are, and that may be considered even
worse. The secret to not falling into either one of these traps is balance and
control. (Remember that metaphorical valve I was writing about?) Once you are
able to balance modesty and arrogance you can keep your mind in healthy
fluctuation between what you are and what you want to be. Control is vital
because you need to realise that you are inevitably in control of yourself. Never
forget that you are your environment, and if the world is going to enjoy any of
your merits and talents you need to control your mind into believing you are,
in fact, capable of getting to where you want to be.
So,
who is to say arrogance is negative? ‘Meaning’ is a self-constructed deduction influenced
by numerous factors. To me, many meanings are mercurial, and are too often
shaped by the majority. If someone is a bit too certain about themselves: what
does that tell you about them? Any common person would say that they are simply
arrogant (as if it’s just one fact in itself), but is that because those who
are arrogant are in fact arrogant? Or
is that because those who aren’t arrogant are weak, making the ‘arrogant’ seem arrogant? Or is arrogance a form of
insecurity – making arrogance a form of weakness? Or do people like to call
arrogance insecurity because it makes them
feel more secure about their
weaknesses?
History
has proved to us, people like to shun the qualities they cannot find in
themselves, and we also know that when the majority forms an opinion on
something, it often stays steadfast. Disregard what your friends think, what
your family thinks and what perhaps you originally thought. If you have
realised thinking is a process of development, then you are already one step
closer to control and perfect impartiality.
It
is ironic I write of impartiality but aim to convey a one-sided message on the positivity
of arrogance. However, when you realise how much the environment around you has
instilled in you the negativity of arrogance, this piece of writing is just one
rogue soldier fighting against an entire army built on convention.
I
have called this “The Art of Arrogance” because arrogance is a form of art. You need to have a vision, you need to have
control, and you can only get better at it with practice. Hopefully you have
started to question some of the things I’ve written about, and more
importantly, have started to question other things too. The main reason I write
this is to encourage thought, and if you have agreed or disagreed with, scoffed at, or
even slandered what I have wrote, then my job is done. You have thought about
what I have written, and you have become aware of your own thoughts too. When you know you are being arrogant and when
you know you are being modest, you realise
you have the power to depict yourself in any way you please. Try to consider every typically negative trait with a broader perspective - it is so easy to ascribe a constant definition to something without further consideration of ulterior meanings and values.
I'll admit, in this tumultuous sea of our realm everything is a game… and I do believe to stay afloat we must all learn to play it.
I'll admit, in this tumultuous sea of our realm everything is a game… and I do believe to stay afloat we must all learn to play it.
In your 5th paragraph you say 'Psychology has showed us'. Although i'm sure the use of the 'showed' is not technically incorrect, in my opinion it would have been as 'Phycology has *shown* us', instead. This is because 'showed' is used to represent past tense - and I guess that, in in this context, that would still be correct - however, in this case, I feel that 'shown' is more suitable as the context leans more towards past perfect tense - which is what 'shown' is used to represent.
ReplyDeleteI know that this is only a small thing but I just couldn't help saying something, as every time I was analysing that paragraph it would catch my eye and annoy me over and over.
I really enjoyed your post and I hope you post more in the future.
Yours Truly, Chicken Man.
Ah shit. I meant to say 'would have been *better* as'. Woops!
DeleteYou're right "Psychology has showed us" does sound a bit off. I know my writing is never going to be absolutely perfect (in content, accuracy etc) but it does well to have people point out small things such as that.
DeleteMerci, Chicken Man.
*Tips fedora*
ReplyDelete